I'm not sure what to make of it, but I find it interesting that I have chosen 200 books essentially at random and have reviewed 100 of them positively and 99 of them negatively. [FYI, there was one review that was ruled Not Applicable. Bonus points to whoever can figure out which book it was and include the title in a comment to this post!]
Getting back to my even-handed nature, does it make me judicious or just predictable???.